NPPF: status of the two author theory

[Glenn Scheper]

>> Here's an example that I think, partly, sums up a form of 'Pale Fire'

>> criticism. In the index of Pale Fire, the notation under 'Lass1 reads

>> 'see Mass,1 the note for 'Mass1 orders the reader to 'see Male,1 then

>> 'Male1 says 'see Word Golf1 (the reader starts to get the joke) and 
>> 'Word Golf1 leads full circle giving the notation 'see Lass.1 Thus, 
>> through literally searching for an answer and elucidation, the reader

>> is lead in a circle of maddening 'word golf,1 that parallels the vain

>> critical search for a definite reality in 'Pale Fire.'

Without having read it yet, just the post above suggests an a:b::c:d
relation, and for male, word golf would be a speech act that tries
to put a ball in a hole. What is mass to lass? For its Latin aspect?
 
Yours truly,
Glenn Scheper
http://home.earthlink.net/~glenn_scheper/
glenn_scheper + at + earthlink.net
Copyleft(!) Forward freely.