Pale Fire

[Vincent A. Maeder]

>Terrance wrote: the schedule has to go.<

An idea: split up the schedule based upon the Commentary, e.g.:
	Week 1: Foreward
	Week 2: Canto lines 1-49 and Commentary pp. 73-93
	Week 3: Canto lines 49-78 and Commentary pp. 93-107
	...and so on allowing the Commentary to run the schedule...

>s~Z wrote: We went round in a circle.<

Yes.  And so will the NPPF reading no matter how it is sliced.  The
schedule above, for example, has similar problems to a straight read
because each commentary refers to other commentaries which refer to yet
other commentaries...

V.