Pale Fire
Vincent A. Maeder
vmaeder at cyhc-law.com
Wed Jun 18 10:40:43 CDT 2003
>Terrance wrote: the schedule has to go.<
An idea: split up the schedule based upon the Commentary, e.g.:
Week 1: Foreward
Week 2: Canto lines 1-49 and Commentary pp. 73-93
Week 3: Canto lines 49-78 and Commentary pp. 93-107
...and so on allowing the Commentary to run the schedule...
>s~Z wrote: We went round in a circle.<
Yes. And so will the NPPF reading no matter how it is sliced. The
schedule above, for example, has similar problems to a straight read
because each commentary refers to other commentaries which refer to yet
other commentaries...
V.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list