Gibson

[David Gentle]

> I think the problem is trying to incorporate such an
> event so soon after it happened. Not that there is a
> moratorium on such matters. But I think you're right
> Paul in stating that Gibson is taking the quick and
> easy way home by incorporating 9/11 in PR.
>
> Rich
You know, Gibson has a website with a discussion board and a weblog. He doesn't post to the board
but he does answer some questions from it in the blog. Maybe you should go and ask him?

http://www.williamgibsonbooks.com/

Haven't read PR yet myself (it hasn't come out here yet and I haven't been able to find a scan of
it) but it is Gibson's first book set aggresively in the present. Maybe he simply couldn't ignore
Nine Eleven? Would a book published in 2002 seem absurd if it made no mention of it?

David Gentle