pynchon agnostic? II
Cyrus
cyrusgeo at netscape.net
Sun Mar 9 15:22:59 CST 2003
thomas kyhn rovsing hjoernet wrote:
>Nothing at all? The etymology below seems to indicate some relation, no?
>
The etymology? Yes, of course. I was referring to the particular
passage, the beginning of St. John's Gospel. The sources seem to agree
"word" is just an appellation for Christ.
>[...] Reasoning on the basis of religious texts appears mostly to have
>grotesque consequences.
>
>
Well, I guess religious texts are not to be reasoned with. Theologians
have been striving over them for nearly 2000 years, leaving almost all
issues still open for debate. Who are we to claim victory?
Cyrus
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list