pynchon agnostic? II

[jbor]

on 11/3/03 8:00 AM, thomas kyhn rovsing hjoernet at tkrh at worldonline.dk
wrote:

> I am not rejecting (what we would call) difference outside of language, but
> that is not the same as to say that such an 'outside' is already divided
> into the 'parts' that language names.

So you're saying that difference outside language is divided into "parts"
other than the ones which language names? Aren't you just setting up an
alternative language by doing this?

best