Orwell/Adorno
Mutualcode at aol.com
Mutualcode at aol.com
Fri Mar 21 05:03:40 CST 2003
...Scholars like Judith Butler at the University of California
had been arguing that 'linguistic transparency' was a
dececption, compelling intellectuals to confine themselves
to the demotic and hampering the capcity 'to think the world
more radically.' Those who took this position- Gayatri Spivak
notable among them- tended to cite Thomas Adorno. Those
who opposed it- Noam Chomsky, for example- commonly
used Orwell's insistence on plain *contestable* speech as
one of their critical resources. Contrasting Adorno and Orwell,
Professor Miller came up with some similarities, some anti-
thesis and some unexpected synthesis. (194-5)
_Why Orwell Matters_, Christopher Hitchens, Basic Books, 2002.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20030321/dc37e0bc/attachment.html>
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list