Orwell/Adorno

Mutualcode at aol.com Mutualcode at aol.com
Fri Mar 21 05:03:40 CST 2003


       ...Scholars like Judith Butler at the University of California
       had been arguing that 'linguistic transparency' was a
       dececption, compelling intellectuals to confine themselves
       to the demotic and hampering the capcity 'to think the world
       more radically.' Those who took this position- Gayatri Spivak
       notable among them- tended to cite Thomas Adorno. Those
       who opposed it- Noam Chomsky, for example- commonly
       used Orwell's insistence on plain *contestable* speech as
       one of their critical resources. Contrasting Adorno and Orwell,
       Professor Miller came up with some similarities, some anti-
       thesis and some unexpected synthesis. (194-5)

_Why Orwell Matters_, Christopher Hitchens, Basic Books, 2002.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20030321/dc37e0bc/attachment.html>


More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list