Pynchon and fascism

[Terrance]

> >
> 
> You asked earlier if I meant that analysis was more objective. Most
> definitely no! The reader is always implicated in the text. To me the
> claim to objectivity means you can rise above it, godlike, unbiased etc.
> As for reliable, I wouldn't use that term either if it carries the same
> godlike/unbiased connotations as objective.




http://www.rbjones.com/rbjpub/philos/epistem/rbj010.htm