"to see deeper...into the human soul...(xvi)"
Bandwraith at aol.com
Bandwraith at aol.com
Fri May 30 21:34:37 CDT 2003
But see- Daniel C. Dennett, _Freedom Evolves_, Viking, 2003. p.1:
One widespread tradition has it that we human beings
are responsible agents, captains of our fate, "because"
what we really are are "souls," immaterial and immortal
clumps of Godstuff that inhabit and control our material
bodies rather like puppeteers. It is our souls that are the
source of all meaning, and the locus of all our suffering,
our joy, our glory and shame. But this idea of immaterial
souls, capable of defying the laws of physics, has outlived
its credibility thanks to the advance of the natural sciences.
Many people think the implications of this are dreadful: We
don't really have "free will" and nothing really matters. The aim
of this book is to show why they are wrong.
cf:
"They can make you say anything- anything- but they can't
make you believe it. They can't get inside you." The poor
kid. You want to grab her and shake her. Because that is
what they do- they get inside, they put the whole question
of the soul, of what we believe to be an inviolable inner core
of the self, into harsh and terminal doubt. By the time they
have left the Ministry of Love, Winston and Julia have
entered permanently the condition of doublethink, the
anterooms of annihilation, no longer in love but able to hate
and love Big Brother at the same time. It is as dark an
ending as can be imagined. (xxiii)
If there is no possibility "question of" a soul to put "into harsh
and terminal doubt," what would O'Brien do for a living? Maybe
that's just another question for "The Late, Late, Late Show."
respectfully
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list