FW: NPPF Commentary Line 230, P. 164

[Paul Mackin]

On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 15:09, Vincent A. Maeder wrote:
> > From: Ghetta Life [mailto:ghetta_outta at hotmail.com]
> > >From: Paul Mackin <paul.mackin at verizon.net>
> > >
> > >The sense seems to be that Life's coming into being is in no way a
> > >logical and predictable consequence of anything coming before.
> > >Therefore, we should not rule out Afterlife simply because it is not a
> > >logical and predictable consequence of life.
> >
> > Yes, but he's using logic to come to this conclusion, reasoning about
> > the unreasonable.
> 
> It is a fun, nonsensical argument.  The more I read this stuff, the more
> funner it gets...
> V.

Is there an Ontological Argument for the Afterlife? It's the Perfect
Idea, therefore it must be true.

P.