NPPF: Commentary to lines 47-48

[Glenn Scheper]

Part 2 of ?

You guys are making me work! I hadn't thought about
2 Corinthians 12:2 in ages, not since I realized FF
is an important religious topic. Let me revise my
interpretation on this point:

12:2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in
     the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot
     tell: God knoweth;) such an one caught up to the third heaven.

12:3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the
     body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;)

12:4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable
     words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.

12:5 Of such an one will I glory: yet of myself I will not glory,
     but in mine infirmities.

If Paul was talking about AF, he would not be wondering whether
in or out of the body. So let's try the fit of Filial Fe11atio.
I hesitate to ask an un-PC question whether adult fe11atio fits.
So, above 14 clearly includes infancy, and Paul might have been
able to logically deduce whether or not FF was inflicted on him.

For example, Jesus could deduce his father was good, not as the
Balaam-Satan-father of Antipas in the third category, Pergamos:
For Jesus to totalize all eight personal conditions, he must be
able to dwell in the three binaries: (gender, good/bad father,
good/bad mother). While Jesus as father-of-self does AF, he can
only ever stand for the FF father, the bad father. So his good
father must have been the biological father, who J did not FF.

To recap my POV, the eight angels adressees are four male AF
(cherubim / swords) and three female AC (six-labia seraphim).
"He who speaks" in the seven letters is each self by AF or AC.
Jesus' ambivalance comes from an originary wet dream in navel.
Otherwise, parents lock each child in one of seven categories.
The mouth is polymorphous, but imprinted by whatso came in it.

Ephesus: Male imprinted by MC (phallic mouth), whereupon AF
confers gender-confusion on pen is, yielding the 4+3 stars.

Smyrna: No abuse. Poverty as a lack of contents, AF reverses.

        (Paul:)
Pergamos: Male imprinted by FF (yonic mouth), AF yields the
"sharp sword with two edges," nominal idiom for short dagger
but I suggest, ingesting two penii. If his father were an AF,
then FF turned dad Balaam-ish; if not, merely a Nicolaitain.
In AF Pergamos in his own mouth is in father-Satan's throne.
Antipas would be one historical instance of a child Pergamos.
If Antipas inflicts FF, he becomes Balaam, whose son fights
against them (now including him) with the sword of his mouth.
That failure would complete the doubling, making his penile
numeric quality like two breasts, making a stone into bread;
Whereas the overcomer picks AF, spurns FF, and gains a white
phallus marked with secret name (lowercase Greek alpha mark).

Thyatira: Male imprinted by FF and MC, whereupon AF makes a
son of God, because all God-as-necessary-being (progenitors)
are all called and present on the on the same throne. Surely
a dangerous combination, probably the aetiology of an Hitler.

(Dividing this evening's work in half for better posting...) 

Yours truly,
Glenn Scheper
http://home.earthlink.net/~glenn_scheper/
glenn_scheper + at + earthlink.net

Copyleft(!) Forward freely.