Vineland underrated

[Ghetta Life]

>From: "Carvill John" <johncarvill at hotmail.com>
>
>>>From: "Carvill John" <johncarvill@[omitted]>
>>>
>>>As to the 1984 introduction, "fuzzy-brained writing"? I'm afraid your 
>>>response to Otto's claim that Pynchon's overt political statements get 
>>>dismissed as "shitty writing" only serves to illustrate his point.
>
>But if you read the 1984 intro and the sloth essay and could still calim 
>some level of ambiguity vis a vis Pynchon's views on the Reagan years 
>(clue: fascism) then your level of delusion is ineluctable.

The quality of his writing (shitty, fuzzy, or otherwise) in his essays has 
nothing to do with any "ambiguity vis a vis Pynchon's views on the Reagan 
years (clue: fascism)"  But maybe your confusion on this point has something 
to do with your opinion about Otto's point being proved a while back.

_________________________________________________________________
Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now 
FREE!  http://msnmessenger-download.com