NPPF Speaking of overt politics ...

[jbor]

       All this is as it should be: the world needs Gradus. But
    Gradus should not kill kings. Vinogradus should never, never
    provoke God. Leningradus should not aim his peashooter at
    people even in dreams, because if he does, a pair of
    colossally thick, abnormally hairy arms will hug him from
    behind and squeeze, squeeze, squeeze. (line 171 note)

best


on 27/9/03 12:05 AM, jbor wrote:

> Of Gradus, the "Extremist":
> 
> Mere springs and coils produced the inward movements of
> our clockwork man. He might be termed a Puritan. One essential
> dislike, formidable in its simplicity, pervaded his dull soul:
> he disliked injustice and deception. He disliked their union -
> they were always together - with a wooden passion that neither
> had, nor needed, words to express itself. Such a dislike should
> have deserved praise had it not been a by-product of the man's
> hopeless stupidity. He called unjust and deceitful everything
> that surpassed his understanding. He worshipped general ideas
> and did so with pedantic aplomb. The generality was godly, the
> specific diabolical. If one person was poor and the other
> wealthy it did not matter what precisely had ruined one or made
> the other rich: the difference itself was unfair, and the poor
> man who did not denounce it was as wicked as the rich one who
> ignored it. People who knew too much, scientists, writers,
> mathematicians, crystalographers and so forth, were no better
> than kings or priests: they all held an unfair share of
> power of which others were cheated. A plain decent fellow should
> constantly be on the watch for some piece of clever knavery
> on the part of nature and neighbor.  (line 171 note)
> 
> Gradus, filtered through Kinbote (filtering Botkin, if necessary), but
> filtering, not too indirectly, Nabokov.
>