Ash Wednesday

[Cyrus]

malignd at yahoo.com wrote:

><<Okay, so we CAN'T pass a Constitutional amendment
>guraranteeing rights at least half the population
>should have had all along (i.e., the ERA), but we now
>perhaps expect to pass a Cosntitutional amendment
>foreclosing the possibility of an apparent tenth of
>the population being ggranted rights they've never had
>here, though, again, should have had all along ...>>
>
>Were such an amendment to be written into the by-laws,
>what would follow, should one of the big league
>outfits, the Roman Catholics, say, or the
>Episcopalians, decide to  allow--even
>encourage--same-sex marriage?
>

Why would they? To them, there is only one purpose in marriage: 
procreation. That's a man+woman thing.

Cyrus