"Pop Kabbalah " & etc.
pynchonoid
pynchonoid at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 7 08:57:03 CST 2004
PW Religion Bookline from Publishers Weekly January 6,
2004
[...]
SPOTLIGHT ON... Pop Kabbalah
Will The Real Zohar Please Stand Up?
For centuries, Jewish mysticism, or kabbalah, was the
exclusive domain
of expert rabbinic sages. Committed to orthodox
Judaism, they were
equally committed to keeping kabbalistic tradition a
secret, shielded
from the masses who might misunderstand its strange,
powerful
teachings or be harmed by them.
With Britney Spears and Madonna now claiming to be
kabbalists,
however, the cat's out of the bag. Today, kabbalah is
for the
everyone. Or is it? Daniel C. Matt's new translation
of the Zohar, the
classic text of Jewish mysticism, has just started
appearing in two
volumes (of a projected 12) from Stanford University
Press. (Volume 1
was released last fall; volume 2 is due this spring.)
Depending on
your perspective, Matt's work may prove that the
traditional
kabbalists rightly kept their wisdom under wraps.
"The Zohar is a demanding book," Matt told BookLine.
"Some people
will want it on their shelf because they have the
Bible or extracts
from the Talmud on their shelf, but they may not do
much with it once
they've bought it." Actually, the book sometimes
verges on
incomprehensible, but Matt has done much to open up
the cryptic,
idiosyncratic Aramaic text for non-experts. The
beautifully produced
tomes are the first-ever full-dress scholarly English
translation,
complete with meticulous, voluminous footnotes.
For all the relative accessibility, however, is it
possible to square
Matt's Zohar with the kabbalah of the Material Girl,
or that of the
traditional rabbis? A student of the controversial
Kabbalah Centre
International, Madonna has even introduced
pop-kabbalistic symbolism
in her videos.
Whether the Zohar's authentic depths are open to
novices depends on
what you think the book is. Outwardly, it is a
commentary on the
Bible's first five books. Religious Jews, however,
have understood it
to be the encoded secrets of the Godhead, the work of
a second-century
A.D. rabbi, Shimon ben Yohai. Secular scholars see in
the Zohar
something less impressive. Matt said he believes it
was actually
composed in the 13th century by a rabbi, Moses de
Leon, who may have
thought he was channeling the spirit of Rabbi Shimon.
Matt contends that non-experts can still appreciate it
on a couple of
levels: "First, the Zohar describes God in feminine
rather than
exclusively masculine terms. That's a surprising thing
to any reader.
Second, it shows us that God is incomplete or is not
fully actualized
without our participation [in spiritual endeavors].
That is an insight
that would affect any reader, Jewish or non-Jewish."
He also noted
"the value of the Zohar as a celebration of the
imagination. It's not
so much what the Zohar says as how it says it, showing
you new aspects
of the biblical text that you might not have thought
of."
All that is comprehensible, if not to Madonna fans,
then to modern
secular readers with a level of academic
sophistication and interest.
But, inevitably, Daniel Matt's translation is a
different Zohar from
that of its masters among orthodox rabbis. To them,
depicting the
Zohar as a work of "imagination" rather than
revelation would nullify
its value. --David Klinghoffer
[...]
Excerpts from the starred reviews appearing in PW
Religion Forecasts
on Monday, January 19:
AMERICAN JEZEBEL: The Uncommon Life of Anne
Hutchinson, the Woman Who
Defied the Puritans
Eve LaPlante. Harper San Francisco, $24.95 (288p) ISBN
0-06-056233-1
LaPlante, an 11th-generation granddaughter of
Hutchinson, provides a
fast-paced and elegant account of Hutchinson's life
and work,
including the reasons that Hutchinson's teachings
threatened the
fabric of Puritan theology. After she moved to the
colonies with her
husband, William Hutchinson, she began to teach that
men and women
could attain salvation not through performing
religious works but
through inward grace. The Puritans, who emphasized
that the covenant
of works was the only guarantee of salvation, charged
her with
antinomianism (an attack against the law of God) and
with violating
God's commands that a woman should not teach. LaPlante
offers a
stimulating account of Hutchinson's eloquent
self-defense at her
trial. Knowing that the magistrates had no religious
or political
grounds to convict her, since a woman was not a
subject of the law,
Hutchinson stymied their questioning. LaPlante's
first-rate biography
offers glimpses into the life and teachings of a
much-neglected figure
in early American religious history. (Mar.)
[...]
To subscribe to PW Religion BookLine, please fill out
the form at
<http://publishersweekly.reviewsnews.com/> [...]
P.S. Thanks, davemarc, for taking the time to correct
jbor's absurd revision of NYC. If only it were that
easy to untangle jbor's ongoing revision of Pynchon's
writing to support the neocon agenda.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list