aw. Re: ([NP]) Hollander

[lorentzen-nicklaus]

|| Hey Biff,

didn't you get that we're now reading GR again?

Btw, unlike you I posted something on the 
Pynchon/Dante stuff:


>>
>> http://www.vheissu.org/art/art_eng_dante_hollander.htm
>> 


> * That's it?!

> The shown parallels are highly superficial, and 
> the audacious thesis that Dante was "perhaps the
> greatest influence on Pynchon's writing" appears 
> to be far fetched.

> If Pynchon does admit anybody "as his [artistic.kfl]
> spiritual double" it's probably not Dante yet Henry
> Adams or, perhaps, Richard Farina ...
>

KFL + 

PS. No schedule: no hosts, just us & them in the
building, in the building dry with flames --  



"Tim Strzechowski" <Dösbaddel at comcast.net> schrieb:
> And by the way, this thread is typical of what this list degenerates into 
> when we don't have a group read in progress.  We're like kids in a classroom
> without the sub.
> 
> Have we decided to read the Pynchon essays and intros, or what?
> 
> If so, what's the schedule?  The host list?
>