TPPM _The Gift_: Sentence 7: abyss sense: 2 of 10

Glenn Scheper glenn_scheper at earthlink.net
Fri Sep 17 05:07:06 CDT 2004


http://www.pynchon.pomona.edu/uncollected/gift.html

I believe this alternate unorthodox realm is veritable, is real, for
I have found similars, my poetic fellows, in authors across all ages.
Again as Jesus said, my sheep hear my voice. It might be only that
such poets and prophets recognize and build upon one another's
misperceptions. One explanation for such persistent misprisons could be,
in so far as language is autopoetic (self-organizing), it could develop
pockets of untruth, like an electrical negative resistance or chaotic
eddies. These might be unstable information structures that collapse
when knowledge frames get reorganized, accounting for the metanoia.

        ---

Some of my fellows are females! I claim to have found something
novel and noteworthy in recognizing the intertwined symbolism of
the two genders, each as equally viable elements of the godhead.
(Yes, a sexual pun on head is intended!) But Emily Dickinson has
already exposited all this in her forty fascicles of arcane holy
poems - if you only had known!

        ---

Aleister Crowley and I both recognize a fellow in Charles Baudelaire.
Charles Baudelaire and I both recognize a fellow in Edgar Allan Poe.

        ---

Here are good ones. Snatching at breasts could not be called
clandestine joys, except during the solitude of aufofellatio.
Lethe is important: In Dante's _Divine Comedy_, it comes
from a divided river, and that appears at his developmental time
in which pap self-suckling seems to be the appropriate referent.
Baudelaire's usage here of Lethe might indicate that Baudelaire
also has the greater knowledge that comes from pap self-suckling.
However it may be rather, that Baudelaire has only acheived the
first metanoia due to autofellatio. In that case, Baudelaire,
working from that lesser epistomological basis, mis-recognized
the ancient Lethe as somehow pertaining to autofellatio, and
conflated the two concepts. This possibility should be a lesson
and a warning to any exegete of the ancient poets and prophets.

        ---

In this poem I read out Aphra's contrast of the unprivileged
divine act of autocunnilingus versus patricentric religiously
recognized and privileged autofellatio, both of which Arm the
Deity, but variously. Here, LOVE replaces LORD on the throne.

        ---
        ---
This next segment about one web page (URL no longer valid)
is obviously another schizoid making a catalog like mine:
        ---
        ---

Paul McCartney on Nostradamus and The Comyn ancient & modern.

 SAUL NOT PAUL, CUMEN NOT KHOMEINI? ALWAYS CENTRAL
 TO THE POLARITY YET NOT RECOGNISED, EXCEPT 'I'M COMING'!

Line 1270: (Reminds me of Nietzsche's over-man going down)

 I am just as well versed to comment upon McCartney's verses
 and lyrics. He has made to many comments, that directly
 relate to the events of my life for them to be chance. With
 this comes an authentic dictionary of McCartney speak in
 which single words are concepts. The most relevant of which
 appropriate here, is the phrase from his song 'When you go
 'Down' again'.

Line 2436: (The same existential issues of the Ouroboros.)

 It was general Monk who rode down from Scotland and
 negotiated the return of the king. In the unsettled times
 after the death of Cromwell. The ever potent McCartney coins
 the lyric 'Monk-Berry-Moon delight!' This pertinent to these
 verses? He's obviously read Nostradamus.

Line 4262: (I believe this testimony alludes to autofellatio!)

 The name Cumming is also a word, coming an adjective. It is
 also the state of sexuality. To all intents and purposes a
 metaphysical state. The christian anagogical experience or
 godhead couldn't be that far removed. In plain terms, from
 someone who knows what he is talking about, it isn't.

        ---

Yours truly,
Glenn Scheper
http://home.earthlink.net/~glenn_scheper/
glenn_scheper + at + earthlink.net
Copyleft(!) Forward freely.




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list