Watts article

[Keith McMullen]

 >>>That's a distortion of what I've actually written in
this forum.<<<

It's my perception and conceptualization. You and I perceive and 
conceptualize things very differently. It is not a distortion.

 >>>If you'd like to talk more about why you think his essays are 
"shitty" and illustrate that with examples, then you'd have something 
worth discussing.  Otherwise, it's just a scatological pot-shot. That 
misses the pot.<<<

There are a few people here who have grounds for critquing the quality 
of my interactions because they practice a more worthy level of 
discourse. You are not one of them.