Sides? (was Re: the terrorist bombings in London

[François Monti]

Paul Mackin wrote:

>> Personally, I don't see anything wrong with a >supply
>> and demand economy, laissez fairer, political
>> self-determination, democracy (these *are* the next
>> steps after debt relief).
>
>
>
> Not really sure about this. Perhaps this IS the precise junction in 
> history at which to begin the switch from the Capitalistic 
> politico-economic system to the more equitable Unicornistic p-e system.
>
> P.

I would actually be interested in knowing whether  "laissez faire" has 
ever been "de rigueur" over the last 250 years. I see protectionism and 
subventions; black ships and win-lose deals. Perhaps this is the precise 
junction in history at which to begin the switch from the Statist 
politico-economic system to "laissez faire".

The problem is not capitalism, it is State-enforced capitalism and 
State-enforced socialism.

François