missing "The Glory Days"

[jbor at bigpond.com]

No, there was nothing objectionable at all: both posts were brief, 
interesting, first-hand reminiscences about Jules and the "Lineland" 
era here. They were posts to the list from other listers which were 
cc'ed to me. One of the two posts was definitely under the 10k limit.

There's no technical reason I can see for two separate posts from two 
separate listers (i.e. different people, not just one person using two 
or more email addresses) not to appear on the list, unless, as I said, 
there was a server malfunction for at least an hour, some 82 hours ago 
now. Or a deliberate block was placed on those posts.

best

On 01/07/2005, at 3:13 AM, Ghetta Life wrote:
>
> Just wondering:  Was there anything "objectionable" in the content of 
> those posts?  This "unmoderated" list has known administrator actions 
> that belie that label in the past...
>
> Ghetta
>
>> From: jbor at bigpond.com
>>
>> I think Will's comment or question might have something to do with 
>> the fact that two -- at least two -- posts on "The Glory Days" thread 
>> were blocked from the list a couple of days ago. I can vouch for this 
>> because the posts were cc'ed to me as well as posted to the list. The 
>> posts were quite long, because the thread was long and the posters 
>> copied what had been posted in the thread previously, but it is now 
>> well outside the 48 hours or however long it takes for posts over 10k 
>> to be screened by the list administrator (and, the posts were in fact 
>> no longer than a couple of the posts that did go straight through to 
>> the list at around the same time anyway). I guess it's possible that 
>> there was a server malfunction for at least an hour some 76 hours 
>> ago; it's also possible that the posts were deliberately blocked for 
>> some reason. Any suggestions from "those who know"?
>>
>> best
>>
>> On 30/06/2005, at 9:55 PM, Will Layman wrote:
>>
>>> Like, fer example, "The Glory Days" look pretty good right now.
>>>
>>>  ??
>>