Big Bang?

[Rcfchess at aol.com]

In a message dated 10/10/2005 11:05:42 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
dmeury at yahoo.com writes:

"I feel  that many people are defensive about it
precisely because it has worked so  well - like they
WANT it to be vulnerable or even hatefull somehow,  yet
they sure do appreciate all the goodies it has helped
produce...and,  whether they admit it or not, they
"use" science or it's conclusions  everyday to manage
their life..hence, they are a bit hypocritical  when
they disdain it wholesale."

The above object under study has  322 dark patterned
units*, some repeated.  They are structured into  67
collective units of varying length.

Meaning is not a province of  this study method but one
can conclude that although the object appears  to
reflect intelligent design, it is only what it is and
cannot be what  it is not, therefore its being excludes
the possibility of deliberate  organizational agency
aside from a random process of "attractions"  and
"repulsions" among its parts.  Anyone who thinks  any
differently must, by definition, be a drooling,
Bible-thumping,  fundamentalist moron.
Q.E.D.

*(There is some debate in the  scientific community
regarding the significance of such units as " , '  .
..., etc.)



yeah, that sounds like conclusive proof...but I'm waiting to hear what  
Barbara Bush has to say before I take it as absolute  FACT...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20051010/f4126e4b/attachment.html>