Gravity's Rainbow Group Read

[jporter]

I think that at this stage in the game, hosts, like the
New York Times, are passe. The only thing this group
really needs is a schedule and interest by list members.
If someone would like to contribute a precis, or series
of questions at the beginning of a scheduled section, it
would be welcome but not necessary. If the form becomes
too free and aimless, the hosting work from one of the
previous group reads could be re-posted to get things
back on track.

jody


On Oct 22, 2005, at 2:44 PM, Will Layman wrote:

> I think this would be fun, but I hope that the "hosts" for the various
> sections will refrain from simply sending out 35 URLs for each section,
> expecting readers to click out to pages of technical rocket data, etc. 
>  Not
> be too old-fashioned, but some thoughtful questions and relevant 
> connections
> (with URLs but with some explanations as to why it will worth the time 
> to
> follow them) would be great.  Reading the book is work (if joyful work)
> enough.
>
> w