Rhttp://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/cosmo.htmle: The Wrath of the Intelligent Designer

[Joe Allonby]

The problem with debating an IDer is time frame. The debate takes place
within a limited time period. THe Ider can keep up for an hour. The public
show ends. The scientist can continude talking for another ten or twenty
hours about the data supporting evolution. The public doesn't hear or see
that. They just see that the know-nothing kept up for an hour. It grants
them false credibility.



On 9/20/05, Paul Mackin <paul.mackin at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 20, 2005, at 3:03 PM, Dave Monroe wrote:
>
> > Jesus Christ. If anything out there actually could,
> > actually bothered to design life, the universe and
> > everything intelligently, why the hell would it have
> > designed us? We're a mess! Intelligent design isn't
> > even designed intelligently. Certainly not
> > scientifically, at any rate. I can se why yr
> > scientifical types simply refuse to debate IDers ...
>
>
> If we'd been intelligently designed we'd be Mac Minis. Compact, run
> very cool, nice looking, make lots of money for Steve Jobs.
>
> Physicist Victor J. Stenger has written quite a lot about what's
> wrong with
> Intelligent Design. I don't know if this is his current or latest
> thinking but
> it seems to me quite clear and convincing.
>
> Note his position on the applicability of the laws of thermodynamics
> or lack thereof to the controversy.
>
>
> http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/cosmo.html
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20050925/c591f8a6/attachment.html>