AtD blurb - "false" religiosity?

[jd]

Wouldn't an agnostic - neither believing nor disbelieving - be more objective?

On 8/17/06, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com> wrote:
> Objective atheismism. What balderdash that atheism leads to some kind
> of objectivity. Atheism is as much of a biased subjective conceptual
> framework as any other ism. There's no way to get beyond
> subjectivity. Es imposible.
>
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 9:45 PM, Otto wrote:
>
> of which direction?
>
> 2006/8/17, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com>:
> > Spoken like a true fundamentalist.
> >
> > On Aug 16, 2006, at 9:16 PM, Otto wrote:
> >
> > Only a true atheist can distinguish between right or false
> > religiosity. All the others aren't objective.
> >
>
>