A Bogus New 9-11

[jd]

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Warrantless-Surveillance.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

I thought that after that bum out we could use some good news - hooray!

So if they're unconstitutional...  what effect might that have?

On 8/17/06, John Carvill <JCarvill at algsoftware.com> wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/17/flying_toilet_terror_labs/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note: This e-mail and its attachments contain only the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the policy(s) of Armstrong Laing Plc in general.
>
> Confidentiality: This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named only and may be confidential.  If they have come to you in error you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone; please reply to this e-mail highlighting the error and then delete it.
>
> Security Warning: Please note that this e-mail has been created in the
> knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium. We advise that you understand and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us.
>
> Viruses: This e-mail and its attachments have been scanned for viruses but we cannot guarantee that they are virus free.  We advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure that they are actually virus free.
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
> service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
> around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
> ________________________________________________________________________
>