Devil's advocate in Slate comments

[Ya Sam]

Subject: Pynchon is a bad writer
From: thetwomacduff
Date: Jul 20 2006 3:52PM

Many of the replies to danielmartinx have missed his main point, which was 
not that the university crowd have abandoned him, but that he is, 
technically, not a very good writer; that his prose is clotted and poorly 
constructed, and that the praise he has received has been for the supposed 
"ideas" content, not for the style, which is often excused, but seldom 
praised.

Of course, every now and then, he pulls off a beautiful passage, viz., the 
opening of Gravity's Rainbow, but he isn't able to consistently write 
readable prose, or even construct moderately well-crafted sentences.

The stuff of Pynchon's Books is, mostly, science fiction, but his technique 
is to swathe that stuff in a style that is self-consciously post-modern, 
and, as he has gone on and on, it is the style that has brought him his fans 
– and yes, I would agree, he has many, and that many are members or 
hangers-on of the "university crowd." But he's an appallingly slipshod 
writer, and, in my opinion, not a very clear thinker.

If you want to read the book that Gravity's Rainbow aspired to be, read Neal 
Stephenson's Cryptonomicon, for it has many of the same concerns, it covers 
the same period and theatre of operations, and it is a much better crafted 
book.

_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! 
http://search.msn.com/