Devil's advocate in Slate comments

Ghetta Life ghetta_outta at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 24 08:48:58 CDT 2006


Cryptonomicon might be "smart," but the writing is generally dreadful.  I 
couldn't take it past about 2/3's in.  Stephenson is writes really poor 
prose.  Pynchon's prose is often fabulously beautiful.

Ghetta

>From: MalignD at aol.com
>
><< See, I've always felt that Cryptonomicon was a watered down attempt by 
>Stephenson as a wanna-be Pynchon to write a GR.  I think Matthew's comment 
>there about sums it up for me as well. >>
>
>These sorts of inevitable comparisons are not constructive.  I don't think 
>Stephenson is a wannabe Pynchon.  Cryptonomicon is wonderful -- smart, 
>fast-paced, clever, but I see no comparison to GR.  They have different 
>aspirations. Any writer smart about science and technology isn't 
>necessarily trying to imitate TP.  He couldn't possibly have thought he was 
>trying to top GR.

_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! 
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list