Devil's advocate in Slate comments
Ghetta Life
ghetta_outta at hotmail.com
Mon Jul 24 08:48:58 CDT 2006
Cryptonomicon might be "smart," but the writing is generally dreadful. I
couldn't take it past about 2/3's in. Stephenson is writes really poor
prose. Pynchon's prose is often fabulously beautiful.
Ghetta
>From: MalignD at aol.com
>
><< See, I've always felt that Cryptonomicon was a watered down attempt by
>Stephenson as a wanna-be Pynchon to write a GR. I think Matthew's comment
>there about sums it up for me as well. >>
>
>These sorts of inevitable comparisons are not constructive. I don't think
>Stephenson is a wannabe Pynchon. Cryptonomicon is wonderful -- smart,
>fast-paced, clever, but I see no comparison to GR. They have different
>aspirations. Any writer smart about science and technology isn't
>necessarily trying to imitate TP. He couldn't possibly have thought he was
>trying to top GR.
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list