Fw: More on the blurb brouhaha

[Otto]

The blurb was to such an extent pynchonian style that I didn't buy 
neither the hoax nor the conspiracy theory, and even less the "marketing 
strategy".

Even "appear" vs "disappear" -- in the sense of a flickering -- would 
have made sense to me, but I simply believe Quail's explanantion: an error.

Otto

Tim Strzechowski wrote:
> Does anyone else here find it weird that such a "conspiracy" would rest 
> solely on the Hope that the appearance of the blurb for *one day* -- 
> only to disappear the next -- would generate enough interest, not to 
> mention notice, to warrant its being deemed a "marketing strategy"?
> 

		
___________________________________________________________ 
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de