Japan Playboy

jd wescac at gmail.com
Fri Jul 28 11:43:24 CDT 2006


I'm gathering that you've read it.

I don't think what he has to say is exactly earth shattering, but I
wouldn't go so far as to call it stupid.  It just depends on your
politics.  And if you're commenting on the actual wording, well, it
went from english to japanese to english again, so that probably isn't
the best way to look at it.  Does it say more than a man-in-the-street
interview?  Not really.  Who cares?  That's what his books are for.

On 7/28/06, Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com> wrote:
> While Dave and I continue roasting our chestnuts, the offer still
> stands. The article is out there. Any "non-(wo)man-in-the street"
> assertions in it? Examples?
>
> On Jul 28, 2006, at 9:22 AM, Dave Monroe wrote:
>
> I'm not worried to.  I've moved on to arguing about
> the argument.  Metaflaming, if you will (and you will)
> ...
>
> --- Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com> wrote:
>
> > Well, there you've illustrated the latter - can you
> > do the same for the former?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list