AtD review for the New Yorker

[Lary Wallace]

Yeah, it's funny, because just today I e-mailed several people Louis Menand's brilliant review of the last Pynchon, and expressed hope that he would be assigned the latest as well. Also, I was just about to look in on the New Yorker's Web site, after I checked my e-mail, and here was your link. This essay should be a treat, and the only way it would spoil the experience of reading AtD would be if he quoted the whole thing, in its entirety. _That_ would be giving major elements away. 



----- Original Message ----
From: "robinlandseadel at comcast.net" <robinlandseadel at comcast.net>
To: Bryan Snyder <wilsonistrey at gmail.com>; P-list <pynchon-l at waste.org>
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 11:52:17 PM
Subject: Re: AtD review for the New Yorker


Sorry, though it ought to be noted that anything labeled "AtD" that has another level to get through before actually getting to the message should be assumed to be containing a whole bouquet of spoilers.
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Bryan Snyder" <wilsonistrey at gmail.com>
> SPOILERS  here everyone... just a PSA.
> 
> On 11/20/06, robinlandseadel at comcast.net <robinlandseadel at comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > LOUIS MENAND weighs in for the New Yorker:
> >
> > http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/articles/061127crbo_books
> >
SPOILERS  here everyone... just a PSA.


On 11/20/06, robinlandseadel at comcast.net < robinlandseadel at comcast.net> wrote:
LOUIS MENAND weighs in for the New Yorker:

http://www.newyorker.com/critics/books/articles/061127crbo_books

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20061119/37b224eb/attachment.html>