NYTBR review

[gp]

I wonder if reviewers try to explain the lack of a photo in more
eloquent terms, just to have editors chop that paragraph out and slap
in "notoriously reclusive".  "Reclusive" is almost a required word for
Pynchon articles, it seems, and I imagine that it's been flubbed by
editors into more than one bit.

On 11/22/06, pynchonoid <pynchonoid at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Nice review except "notoriously reclusive" is all
> wrong and "famously solitary" (I think that was it) is
> just dumb. She's calling Pynchon was a hermit? How
> would she, or anybody except the individuals involved,
> know?
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Music Unlimited
> Access over 1 million songs.
> http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
>