authors under the influence

gp wescac at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 01:36:54 CDT 2006


I don't know what to think about his stance as far as drugs go.
Perhaps "moderation is key"?  But frankly the uber-weed he describes
in the book contains nothing positive.  He sort of makes it sound like
crack.

On 10/17/06, Daniel Julius <daniel.julius at gmail.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> I don't think Wallace wants you to extinguish yr joint.  I know I don't.  I
> read the other David's account of AA and NA in _Jest_ not as a cautionary
> tale, a "reader: don't smoke big-bad weed cause it'll make you drool like
> Hal," but as a really very dark and pessimistic extension of a greater point
> -- that everything is essentially addictive.  That external stimuli as
> innocent as tennis or rock music or whatever cause chemical changes in yr
> brain, just like coke or heroin or Tylenol or anything else does, and that
> drugs are just one of the many distractions modern people often turn to to
> remind themselves to forget either their own mortality, or boredom, or
> loneliness, or anhedonia or whatever psychically ails you, but ultimately,
> to forget those nasty little truths lurking around our brains all the time
> (if, that is, yer naturally depressive, which, you know, who isn't?).
>
> Hal thinks (and I can hear all you fuckers groaning right now) that
> "it...lately sometimes seemed like a kind of black miracle...that people
> could actually care deeply about a subject or pursuit, and could go on
> caring this way for years on end.  Could dedicate their entire lives to it.
> It seemed admirable and at the same time pathetic" (900), and it's also, I
> believe, inevitable.  Weed, God, Satan, Ween, The Grateful Dead, "politics
> or grammar, topology or philately" (900), codeine, P-lists, Wallace lists,
> or work, or anything: choose your distraction.  _Jest_ isn't Reefer Madness
> propaganda, it's a profound empathetic gesture to the reader that says "I
> know how you feel, modern human being; a lot of us feel the same way right
> now."
>
> IMO, anyway.  I just really like that damn book.
>
> --
> Dan



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list