ATD Spoilers

[Paul Mackin]

On Oct 29, 2006, at 4:09 AM, Tore Rye Andersen wrote:
> they apparently spoil the pleasures for others, and I will of  
> course respect that.
>
> It does constitute a problem, though, that one reader's interesting  
> tidbit can be another reader's spoiler, and it seems rather  
> difficult to agree on what exactly is allowed, here. Might I  
> suggest the relatively simple expedient that any AtD-related post  
> includes "AtD" in the subject line? (I think Doug suggested this  
> already). Those readers who don't like spoilers of any kind can  
> simply avoid these posts, then, and the rest of us can speculate  
> and discuss and guess all we like, without worrying that our  
> innocent musings will spoil the pleasure for others.

This seems about right.    An even simpler thing would be to label  
any post that's NOT about the new book NATD.