include ATD + PAGE # + SUBJECT to avoid Spoilers Re: AtD RE: ATD Spoilers

[Paul Mackin]

On Oct 29, 2006, at 10:54 AM, bekah wrote:

>
> BUT!   It gets hard to keep the reply post references within the  
> limits of the first post when a bit more has been read.   So we  
> might have to update numbers in the  subject line page  for every  
> post that extends the number of pages read.   Or note them in the  
> post with some paragraph split and **SPOILER** notes when we go  
> further than the pages noted in the subject line.
>

hate to discourage but long years of experience with the p-list tells  
me such refinements are impractical.

Only the very simplest convention will have any hope of being followed.

In other words, page numbers are OK but don't anybody rely on them.

If unsure just unsubscribe while reading the book--everything you  
miss will be in the archieves.