In Honor Of John Krafft

Carvill John johncarvill at hotmail.com
Sun Oct 29 17:34:26 CST 2006


Nice to see your positivity is still unwavering, Keith.


>From: Keith McMullen <keithsz at mac.com>
>To: Pynchon-L <pynchon-l at waste.org>
>Subject: In Honor Of John Krafft
>Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:49:12 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
>Received: from waste.org ([66.93.16.53]) by bay0-mc9-f9.bay0.hotmail.com 
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:59:20 -0800
>Received: from waste.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by waste.org 
>(8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id 
>k9TMm3KM001675(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 
>verify=NOT);Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:48:03 -0600
>Received: (from majordomo at localhost)by waste.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id 
>k9TMm3AG001674;Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:48:03 -0600
>Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.174])by 
>waste.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id k9TMluCd001658for 
><pynchon-l at waste.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:47:57 -0600
>Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152])by smtpout.mac.com 
>(Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k9TMnFgU003406for 
><pynchon-l at waste.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:49:15 -0800 (PST)
>Received: from [10.0.1.4] (venturaca-1-c7-249.vnnyca.adelphia.net 
>[68.69.196.249] (may be forged))(authenticated bits=0)by mac.com 
>(Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id 
>k9TMnD8b009178(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO)for 
><pynchon-l at waste.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:49:14 -0800 (PST)
>X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW42B47EpTp06h3svGFOK1q5QzFy1hwcivp4=
>References: <20061029222941.45029.qmail at web34706.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
>X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
>X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
>X-Brightmail-scanned: yes
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
>Precedence: bulk
>Return-Path: owner-pynchon-l at waste.org
>X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Oct 2006 22:59:21.0174 (UTC) 
>FILETIME=[DEC0F760:01C6FBAD]
>
>Any chance we could put a bit of effort into not re-posting the  entirety 
>of the posts to which we are responding? Judging from the  glut of posts 
>responding to the imminence of AtD, we are on the verge  of list traffic 
>like we've never seen. Many of the pre-release posts  are so full of 
>chaotic material from previous posts in the thread, I  just delete them, 
>unread. The number of new posts is staggering  enough, without the entirety 
>of previous posts being blue-lined in  each of them. If we don't keep some 
>sense of clarity and focus, the  upcoming free-for-all is going to be 
>undecipherable. Of course, that  will probably be true regardless, so never 
>mind.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
All-in-one security and maintenance for your PC.  Get a free 90-day trial! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwlo0050000002msn/direct/01/?href=http://www.windowsonecare.com/?sc_cid=msn_hotmail




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list