ATDTDA (7): 201-203 decoding

[Ray Easton]

It appears to me that the non-mathematicians on the list (quite 
understandably) attach far too much significance to the math in AtD.  
To me, it appears that it's just not very important.

*That* people are "doing math" -- that is important.  But no so much 
the details of the math they are doing.

Ray

On Sunday, Apr 29, 2007, at 13:02 US/Central, Ya Sam wrote:

>> No, I think I have, for the most part, restrained myself myself
>> from going off onto maths tangents.
>
> Please do not restrain yourself, especially when we reach the 
> Gottingen section, we're in dire need of the likes of you, Monte and 
> other scientifickally-minded chums.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's 
> FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>