Nevsky/Stalin

Henry scuffling at gmail.com
Tue Jun 5 11:12:08 CDT 2007


Begs the question: would a film currently glorifying the USA be inherently
pro-Bush.  Sure it would.  But it's hero wouldn't necessarily represent the
Bush-baby himself.  Ivan the Terrible (the Awesome) ruthlessly united the
Russian states, which makes him a more obvious Stalin.

Henry M 
http://www.urdomain.us/kcuf.htm 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-pynchon-l at waste.org [mailto:owner-pynchon-l at waste.org] On Behalf
Of Keith
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:48 AM
To: Masochistic Devotees
Subject: Re: Nevsky/Stalin

And that's a fine opinion, just not one shared by the people who put  
on and reviewed the recent "Shadow of Stalin" series in LA.

On Jun 5, 2007, at 8:15 AM, Ya Sam wrote:

I disagree with that. If we speak allegorically, the film glorifies  
the might of Soviet arms, the unity of Russian people when under  
threat, and other patriotic stuff. It isn't a panegiric to Stalin.




More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list