Atdtda [4]: 98.18 It could have been a religion

[David Casseres]

On 3/8/07, Monte Davis <monte.davis at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>  DC:
> > What's a "secular fundamentalist"?  Is there a secular "gospel" to be
> >  interpreted literally and without question?
>
> Webb's union card seems to come close.
>


Point taken.  The phrase still seems weird to me, though.  Webb's not
ideological, he's just bonded indissolubly to his own social class and the
organization that stands up for it.  I've known Marxists whom I might call
"secular fundamentalists," but Webb doesn't remind me of them at all.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20070308/9cdd70bd/attachment.html>