ATDTDA (5.1) - The Etienne-Louis Malus
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Tue Mar 20 12:59:13 CDT 2007
Whatever we (or for that matter Al Qaeda or the conspiracy buff
on the corner) may advance as the "causes of" or "reasons for"
9/11, I don't see how they map to "scientists dig up and bring
home an ancient artifact, suggestive of pre- or non-human origin,
that they should have left untouched."
I recall responding to:
John Carville:
. . . .the song contains a hint of the forboding which has
attended every mention of the Vormance Expedition so far:
For we sail
With no sure returning,
Into winds
That will freeze the soul. . . .
. . . .What are we to make of the fact that the Vormance
Expedition, in early mentions, is routinely spoken of in
terms which suggest that the reader already knows
what will eventually become of it? It's as if it were a
famous historical event, of which any reader can
reasonably be expected to be aware, as would be
the case if Pynchon were talking about, say, the Titanic.
So, my post was in reference to the vibe that permanently surrounds any
tale told or re-told concerning the "Vormance Expedition" in the aftermath
of that tragedy. One assumes that the novel's narrator is speaking from
some time well after the events in question.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list