AtDTDA: (8) 219 T.W.I.T.
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Sat May 5 22:31:25 CDT 2007
I posted this 8/8/06, after the cover art and self-authored blurbs appeared:
Something I have yet to hear mentioned here: What if
Against the Day turns out to be The Big One, the
one that ties it all together?
Heres my thoughts. The Occult elements of Pynchon
always have been my focus. This just dawned on me:
Mason & Dixon deals with the historical Mason/Dixon
line between an age alchemical and an age scientific.
Along with all those anachronisims and bad puns,
there's tonne's of olde magicke and persuits alchemical.
The historical range of Against the Day covers the
early development of the Golden Dawn. This will tie this
book much more tightly to the occult elements in
Gravitys Rainbow. ATD just might be The Big One.
http://waste.org/mail/?list=pynchon-l&month=0608&msg=104200&sort=date
"T.W.I.T." and Nicholas Nookshaft are Pynchon's portraits, rendered
only as Pynchon could render them, of Ordo Templi Orientis and the
group's nortorious founder, Aleistair Crowley
"The letters O.T.O. stand for Ordo Templi Orientis, the
Order of Oriental Templars, or Order of the Temple
of the East. O.T.O. is dedicated to the high purpose
of securing the Liberty of the Individual and his or her
advancement in Light, Wisdom, Understanding,
Knowledge, and Power through Beauty, Courage, and
Wit, on the Foundation of Universal Brotherhood.
http://oto-usa.org/
This is the official history of O.T.O.:
http://oto-usa.org/history.html
These are some comparatively sane histories of Crowley:
http://www.crystalinks.com/crowley.html
http://www.answers.com/topic/aleister-crowley
I've been slowly digesting Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley
by Lawrence Sutin, that is very detailed and quite fair in its
presentation of "The Great Beast.
http://tinyurl.com/yokqsp
My neice is in the O.T.O. I read her pages 219-222, trying to elicit a reaction.
She found it mostly hysterical, and hysterical in spots where I would detect no
obvious content that would elicit such a reaction. As far as I can tell, the
Jokes in "T.W.I.T." are inside jokes, the work of someone who, if not an
insider, probably should be. I wish there was some arethmatic symbol for
"not equal to, but close enough for barter". Consider the following:
T.W.I.T. = True Worshipers of the Ineffable Tetractys.
For followers of Thelema (Aleistair Crowley's Magickal system) the phrase
"the Ineffable name of the Tetragrammaton" would be the first thing that
would come to mind.
http://www.answers.com/topic/tetragrammaton
The most important number of all, to the Pythagoreans,
was the fourth triangular number, 10. For it was made
up of 1 + 2 + 3 + 4. They called it the "Sacred Tetractys,"
swore by it in their oaths, and attached marvelous
properties to it, as "the source and root of eternal nature."
http://www.anselm.edu/homepage/dbanach/pyth3.htm
The T.W.I.T./O.T.O. correspondences are presented as satire, as parody.
The caricature of Aleister Crowley (in the form of Nicholas Nookshaft) is as
specific as a portrait as that of Jeshimon's Governor. The difference being
that the Governor's prescence is pretty much limited to the section we just
passed through, whereas "The Grand Cohen" [doubtless the progenitor
of Gengis Cohen] has his fingerprints all over the book, like Snape on Potter.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list