Atta (9): 242: Today's kick-ass question

[David Morris]

No no no, you didn't spoil anything.  When someone puts "spoiler"
before their posted comments it means to warn the reader that if they
keep reading the post will speak of things to be seen in future
segments of the group read.  And that one should stop reading if one
is worried about such things.

On 5/17/07, Bryan Snyder <wilsonistrey at gmail.com> wrote:
> Spoiler?  I REALLY did not intend to spoil ANYTHING... (and I'm not sure where that happens in what you quoted) but do understand that I myself am someone who while reading AtD was very upset when I would stumble across a spoiler and I try to indicate that in the subject if I think it is needed.
>
> I am very sorry if I unintentionally ruined ANY part of this book for you, seriously.  I did not mean to do that.
>
> Sorry,
> B
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Morris [mailto:fqmorris at gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:07 PM
> To: wilsonistrey at gmail.com
> Cc: Jasper; pynchon-l at waste.org
> Subject: Re: Atta (9): 242: Today's kick-ass question
>
> On 5/16/07, Bryan Snyder <wilsonistrey at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Oh... no system really, but typical anarchist theory normally puts forth
> one where non-appealing work is shared (revolving schedules and the like)
> and the logic they follow is that the rest of the work would be done out of
> true choice, i.e. a farmer would WANT to farm and provide food, the
> carpenter loves to build things etc... self-actualization available to
> everyone.  I, personally, am aware it's a idealistic fantasy really only
> possible in very small communities
>
> SPOILER!!!!!
>
> I'm  in the 900's now, and won't finish AtD before I leave for a 2
> week trip to Florence, and since the book is so big & heavy I won't be
> taking it with me, so fishing AtD for me won't happen until mid June.
> I'll also be missing from this list for that time period.
>
> That said (only as an intro to where I'm at right now), last night I
> read the section where Reef, Cyprian, and Yashmeen find the
> Anarchist's Spa, and I really felt like I was reading some sort of
> political tract (OK, it's not THAT extreme).  Thank God it doesn't go
> on for endless pages, and it's written in a comic manner, so I sense a
> certain amount of Pynchon's distancing himself from these ideals.  But
> other than those two qualifiers, I immediately thought of the long
> preachy segment towards the end of Atlas Shrugged (Yuck!).
>
> I really think this book would have been better without that section
> altogether.
>
> David Morris
>
>