Pynchon and porno (WAS: NP - Porn hurting male libido/attitude towards women??)
Tore Rye Andersen
torerye at hotmail.com
Tue May 22 03:12:12 CDT 2007
Ya Sam:
>The worst porn I've ever been exposed to is 'The Da Vinci Code'. This is
>really kinky and even worse than skull-drilling or whatever.
Thomas Pynchon (through the revolutionary Vanya in GR):
"look at the forms of capitalist expression. Pornographies: pornographies of
love, erotic love, Christian love, boy-and-his-dog, pornographies of
sunsets, pornographies of killing, and pornographies of deduction -- _ahh_,
that sigh when we guess the murderer -- all these novels, these films and
songs they lull us with, they're approaches, more comfortable and less so,
to that Absolute Comfort. [...] The self-induced orgasm." (GR, 155)
- which probably gives a fair indication of P's own feelings about the noble
art of pornography. Cf. also his description in the same novel of both film
and calculus as "pornographies of flight. Reminders of impotence and
abstraction" (GR, 567).
On the other hand, here are Pirate Prentice's musings on the reaction of
Roger Mexico as he received Bloat's photographs of Slothrop's desk:
"Wasn't Mexico's face tonight, as he took the envelope, averted? eyes boxing
the corners of the room at top speed, a pornography customer's reflex...
hmm. Knowing Bloat, perhaps that's what it is, young lady gamming
well-set-up young man, several poses -- more wholesome than anything this
war's ever photographed... life, at least..." (GR, 35)
It's probably fair to say that P comes squarely down on both sides of this
question. FWIW, though, I tend to believe that arousal is the last thing
that's on Pynchon's mind as he writes his own pornographical scenes. The
scene between Katje and Pudding in GR, for instance, is an exploration of
power, of submission, and of the reality of pain. The juicy triangle between
Cyprian, Yashmeen, and Reef in AtD is equally all about power. I'm not that
sure of the scene between Slothrop and Bianca, except that - again - its
main purpose is not to arouse us. One way of viewing the scene is as a
subversion of the corporate State's cooptation of the culture of childhood.
Of the rationale behind the children's resort Zwölfkinder we hear:
"In a corporate State, a place must be made for innocence, and its many
uses. In developing an official version of innocence, the culture of
childhood has proven invaluable." (GR, 419)
In his essay "Reading Gravity's Rainbow After September Eleventh: An
Anecdotal Approach," David Rando has (convincingly, IMO) read the sex scene
between Slothrop and Bianca as "a means of resisting the state's long
history of appropriating the innocence of its children for its prosecution
of war." Once again, the main purpose of P's pornography is not to arouse,
but - like Charlie Parker's music - "to gainsay the Man's lullabies, to
subvert the groggy wash of the endlessly, gutlessly overdubbed strings...."
(GR, 64).
There's pornography, and there's pornography, and my guess is that Pynchon
has little time for, or interest in, the kind of pornography that's merely
meant to let us approach "that Absolute Comfort - the self-induced orgasm."
That's certainly not the kind of pornography he practices in his novels, but
it is probably the kind of pornography practiced by Tristan Taormino, and
frankly I don't find it overly strange that he has refrained from giving her
his public support. Pynchon appropriates and transforms some of
pornography's codes for his own purposes, just as he appropriates and
transforms other codes of popular culture, but we wouldn't expect him to
publicly endorse any old porn flick, just as we wouldn't expect him to
publicly endorse Dan Brown's next novel, o-or Die Hard 4.
_________________________________________________________________
Ta' på udsalg året rundt på MSN Shopping: http://shopping.msn.dk - her
finder du altid de bedste priser
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list