It's about time. . . .

[David Morris]

Well, I usually discount vast conspiracy theories because it is
inconceivable to me that the huge numbers of people necessary to pull
off such vast operations could be completely immune to leaks.
Informational cracks in such organizations seem inevitable.  9-11
being an "inside job," engineered by a secret structure within our own
government seems incredible for that very simple reason.

but...

As presented on this film, the Twin Towers collapse, not to mention
building #7(which I'd never heard of), do look like engineered,
controlled demolitions...

However, such controlled demolitions require cutting of steel columns
at every level, not just the basement.  Collapse started at the top,
not the bottom, as the film implies was the case.  Controlled
demolitions require timed explosions at all levels, and are the work
of teams of workers.  It is implausible that such an operation could
have taken place in an occupied office tower in the weeks before 9-11
without being noticed.

But I know this film has a mission, and will likely exaggerate and
obscure to make plausible its thesis, so I hesitate to swallow whole
what it presents.  And my initial reason for resistance still seems a
basic hard-to-deny premise...

The film's initial investigation of the roots of Judeo-christian
mythology was very interesting, but what does it have to do with 9-11?

David Morris

On 10/31/07, robinlandseadel at comcast.net <robinlandseadel at comcast.net> wrote:
> Happy Samhain!
>
> If this ain't Pynchonian, I don't know what is:
>
> http://zeitgeistmovie.com/
>
> Think, just for a moment, about the role of controlled explosions in AtD. . . .
>