Tree of Smoke
Keith
keithsz at mac.com
Sun Nov 18 16:53:03 CST 2007
Neither the novel, nor the movie, holds up under that level of
scrutiny. Plausibility is stretched at every turn.
I loved both as suspenseful, but actually very light, entertainment.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 2:16 PM, Richard Ryan wrote:
The writing is evocative, but that scene made no sense to me. Why
did Wells, a trained killer like Chigurh, go docilely to his death?
Why did he walk into Chigurh's trap and then submit to his own
execution? And why did McCarthy introduce an interesting character -
in some sense a sane version of Chigurh - and then eliminate him? To
make a some didactic point about the implacability of Chigurh and the
evil that he represents?
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list