Fw: AtD pg 675

[Mark Kohut]

So, is this "seeing' perspective, Pynchon recognizing human consciousness
in 'grasping the cosmos? 
 
His way of, once more, indicating that the "answers" lie outside of pure math and 
scientific measurements? Always another step? 
 
Is this a kind of metaphoric Godel's theorem? 
 


 
----- Original Message ----
From: Michael J. Hußmann <michael at michael-hussmann.de>
To: pynchon-l at waste.org
Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2008 9:37:10 AM
Subject: Re: AtD pg 675

Richard Fiero (rfiero at gmail.com) wrote:

> ". . . he understood that this zigzagging around [yo-yoing?] around 
> through four-dimensional space-time might be expressed as a vector in 
> five dimensions.  Whatever the number of n dimensions it inhabited, 
> an observer would need one extra n+1, to see it and connect the end 
> points to make a single resultant."
> Why does Kit seem to think that n+1 dimensions are needed?

Good question. You don't need an extra dimension just for the resultant
vector, and you might just add up the individual vectors to draw the
resultant, all within n dimensions. But insofar as "seeing it" requires
an outside observer -- you cannot "see" a path on a two dimensional
surface unless you rise above this surface in a third dimension --,
another dimension becomes necessary.

- Michael


Michael J. Hußmann

E-mail: michael at michael-hussmann.de
WWW (personal): http://michael-hussmann.de
WWW (professional): http://digicam-experts.de








Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.


      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://waste.org/pipermail/pynchon-l/attachments/20080105/c7f5de0a/attachment.html>