Velvet Underground

[rich]

one could argue that one of the reasons for the Kinks lower profile
than the beatles, stones or the who was their designation as being too
overly British, at least to American audiences.so i've been told





On 4/28/09, Dave Monroe <against.the.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Joe Allonby <joeallonby at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just had the "Who or Kinks" debate at a band rehearsal. Ironcally, I
>> as songwriter came down on the Who side. The lead guitarist was firmly
>> in the Kinks camp. But then again, he is John Felice
>
> Kinks, and I'm a HUGE Who fan, I've put vintage Rickenbackers through
> speakers in St. Townshend's name an' ev'rything, but ... but Los
> Brotehrs Davies et al. simply held up better for longer, more
> consistnetly and more brilliantly.  But then again, I think teh real
> question is, The Beatles or The Kinks?  Except The Beatles beat all
> comers, so ...
>