A Question about IV

[rich]

how do we reconcile the apparent superficial nature of IV overall with
any in-depth reading--e.g. lots of talk about Aunt Reet and there sure
seems alot of stuff being thrown down based on a character with only a
couple of lines. I mean its in the nature of our Pynchon discourse
mind you, so I'm not ragging on anybody. I'm still not convinced,
however, that this book requires deep investigation of the obscure for
some deeper insight.

rich