Back from the beach
Robin Landseadel
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Mon Aug 3 07:49:48 CDT 2009
On Aug 3, 2009, at 5:30 AM, Carvill, John wrote:
> I still cleave to the hope (and in fact, the belief) that ATD will be
> revalued as the years pass. I know some of us hard-core Pynchonnistas
> didn't much care for it - and there were time where I personally got
> frustrated with it - but overall I still count it as a work of genius.
I'm sure it will. Mason& Dixon pretty much got off scott-free with
plenty of critical praise in spite of its murkiness. For one thing,
merely by virtue of its erudite flow of antique language forms, many
critical voices had to admit there was "something" there, even if
ultimately they either didn't or couldn't "get it." But the shifting
voices of all those genre fictions in Against the Day, coupled with
the often giddy & silly tone of the book made AtD a much easier target
for self-appointed cultural warriors to rail against its inherent
decadence. If Gravity's Rainbow were to be dropped into our collective
consciousness at the same time AtD dropped, the critical raving would
probably be even greater than the drubbing AtD received in some
quarters.
The extraordinary level of satire and a consciousness of emerging
fictional genres in Against the Day will be easier to scrye after AtD
gets re-read by us older folk and read for the first time by younger
audiences.
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list