Editing Pynchon?

Carvill John johncarvill at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 7 08:49:06 CDT 2009


Come on, David. Sloppiness is arguable (and a tad insulting), I agree it is baggy but it's built that way: not so much 'fat' as 'big boned'.

But decline in skill? I don't think so. 



----------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:10:37 -0500
> Subject: Re: Editing Pynchon?
> From: fqmorris at gmail.com
> To: johncarvill at hotmail.com
> CC: hraudask at sun3.oulu.fi; pynchon-l at waste.org
>
> Obviously those who suggest AGTD needs editing (in the sense of
> advisor, of course) don't think "it's fine as it is." To me it
> represent sloppiness and a decline of skill. Opinions differ. So be
> it.
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get free photo software from Windows Live
http://www.windowslive.com/online/photos?ocid=PID23393::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_PH_software:082009



More information about the Pynchon-l mailing list