IVIV (1) Shasta
Robin Landseadel
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Mon Aug 24 18:48:53 CDT 2009
On Aug 24, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Dave Monroe wrote:
> "'That you, Shasta?'" (IV, Ch. 1, p. 1)
For what it's worth, and it might not be worth all that much, I see
Shasta as symbolic of Hippie aspiration. Hippie being a particularly
California sorta thing, and the physical locale & destination of
Shasta being the sort of California myth particularly attractive to
hippies and their ilk.
So here we have this symbolic repository of Hippie essence, and then
1969 rolls along and whoa—look at what happened, man, like a
trainwreck. It was that fast, it was all over that fast. Shasta in
many ways is the representation of the Hippie Dream [leastaways for us
boys] as of 1967, and now it's 1970 and yes, she did change,
everything changed, the whole Manson thing really did go that deep.
You know, historical fiction & sexual politics and all that? 1970?
Shasta is also a creation right out of Raymond Chandler—the young
debutant aiming to be a star and settling for something less. That
something less that she marries into is in it but deep with & the
wrong kinds of folks to rumble with. Turns out the folks who have
clout usually hire gorillas who specializing in clouting. So it turns
out in Inherent Vice as it does in Farewell My Lovely and The Long
Goodbye. It always out starts with this dame . . .
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list