The flattened American landscape of minor writers
Robin Landseadel
robinlandseadel at comcast.net
Tue Feb 24 12:27:42 CST 2009
I'm sorry, this is a semidiotic discussion of signifiers &
"difference", abuse is two doors down and to the left.
On Feb 24, 2009, at 9:16 AM, David Gentle wrote:
>> Updike Schmupdike!
>> Why do these slavering articles on Updike (and Roth) in the English
>> press always discount, in fact often fail entirely to mention,
>> Pynchon?
> Because they're not about him? And he's not dead yet?
>
> David Gentle
. . .Thus the remarkably theory-saturated approaches of the
1990s and early 2000s have, as McHoul and Wills explained,
often explicitly abandoned the idea of exegetically tracing (and
explaining) the "'actual,' 'underlying' rationale for Pynchon's
writing" . . .
http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/fictionspresent/speculated
Remarkably ad-hominum-saturated approaches to flaming often explicitly
abandon the idea of exegetically tracing (and explaining) the
"'actual' Pynchon's writing" . . .
More information about the Pynchon-l
mailing list